![]() It makes only a slight difference in total bitrate, and may be similar to Premiere Pro's option for CBR vs VBR 1-pass vs VBR 2-pass encoding, but we have no way of knowing for sure. For example, the difference between H.264 'Faster Encode' and H.264 'Higher Quality' isn't explained anywhere in Apple's documentation. Note: preview codec, target bitrates, and other settings in Adobe Premiere Pro were based on analyzing the Final Cut Pro files.Ĭoming up with tests that were close to identical was tricky because Final Cut Pro gives you less control over how and what you can render and export unless you also buy Apple's Compressor software. So we took an 8K project filmed on the Sony a1, compiled it into two identical 4K timelines with identical effects, scoured the settings to ensure everything was as similar as reasonably possible, and then ran both of these video editors through the same battery of tests. Pure performance, on the other hand, is measurable. How quickly you can edit a video from start to finish in either Premiere Pro or Final Cut is largely a matter of personal preference and familiarity with each application's quirks. Tests | Computers | Results | Key takeaways | Final thoughts But for all the head-to-head editing shootouts and 'why I switched' anecdotes from disgruntled Adobe and/or Apple users, what matters in the end is raw performance. They both have 'Pro' in the name, so according to Apple nomenclature rules they should both be excellent. But among video editors, especially the ones on YouTube, one scuffle comes up more than any other: Apple Final Cut Pro or Adobe Premiere Pro? Crunchy peanut butter or smooth? (Smooth). Some Motion templates on this webpage are available from are some debates that stand the test of time.Performance tests are conducted using specific computer systems and reflect the approximate performance of Mac Studio and iMac. ![]() Prerelease Final Cut Pro 10.6.2 tested using a complex five-minute project with 8K ProRes 422 media. Testing conducted by Apple in February 2022 using preproduction Mac Studio systems with Apple M1 Ultra, 20-core CPU, 64-core GPU, 128GB of RAM and 8TB SSD, as well as production 3.6GHz 10-core Intel Core i9–based 27-inch iMac systems with Radeon Pro 5700 XT graphics with 16GB of GDDR6, 128GB of RAM and 8TB SSD. ![]() Prerelease Final Cut Pro 10.6.2 tested using a five-minute project with 4K Apple ProRes 4444 media, at 3840-by-2160 resolution and 23.98 frames per second, transcoded to Apple ProRes 422. Performance tests are conducted using specific computer systems and reflect the approximate performance of Mac Studio. ![]() Prerelease Final Cut Pro 10.6.2 tested using a one-minute picture-in-picture project with 18 streams of Apple ProRes 422 video at 8192-by-4320 resolution and 30 frames per second, as well as a one-minute picture-in-picture project with 56 streams of Apple ProRes 422 video at 3840-by-2160 resolution and 29.97 frames per second. Testing conducted by Apple in February 2022 using preproduction Mac Studio systems with Apple M1 Ultra, 20-core CPU, 64-core GPU, 128GB of RAM and 8TB SSD.macOS Ventura or later is required to edit Cinematic mode video captured on devices with iOS 16 or later. macOS Monterey or later is required to edit Cinematic mode video on devices with iOS 15. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |